Skip to content

Full-service management, co-hosting or doing it yourself?

Owners often think the choice is between hiring a manager or not. In practice there are three quite different arrangements, and plenty of owners move between them over the years.

Full-service management

The manager runs the rental end to end: pricing, listing, guests, cleaning, laundry, maintenance and reporting. You receive statements and payments, decide on larger repairs and book your own stays through them.

Suits you if you live far away, have little time, or simply do not want to be called about a broken kettle. The trade-off is control: you will not choose every cleaner or answer every guest, so the choice of manager matters more than anything else.

Co-hosting

You keep the listing and the overall decisions, and a co-host takes on part of the work — often guest messages, check-ins and coordinating cleaning. The split varies a great deal from one arrangement to the next, which is exactly why it must be written down.

Suits you if you want to stay involved in pricing and presentation but cannot be on call. The trade-off is shared responsibility: when something falls between the two of you, guests notice before you do.

Self-managing with a local team

You do the planning and the guest communication, and pay local people for the physical work: a cleaner, a laundry service, a handyperson, perhaps a neighbour who holds a spare key.

Suits you if you enjoy hosting, live close enough to step in, or own a home simple enough that little goes wrong. The trade-off is your time, and the fact that the system depends on you being reachable every single day of the season.

Questions that decide it

Whichever you choose, the habits on the rest of this site still apply. Someone has to welcome the guests, check the linens and know which plumber to call — the only question is who.